|
Richard Allen's words on WeldingThis article is built from a series of articles which Richard Allen dini_44@ablewise.com posted to the ATIS Stationary Engine Mailing List both in answer to peoples questions and by way of extra information he wanted to pass on to the rest of the list members. I decided to join his words in an article on welding because I found his words interesting and informative.Disclaimer: While Richard is an experienced welder, the responsibility for following any of the adivce is yours. You need a welder!If you collect and/or work on old stationary engines you've got to have a welder! Some day you will need an engine cart, and you can make your own.I taught welding in high school many years ago, and it is not that hard. My class was the evening class and I had adults in it. They were my best students. Go get yourself an inexpensive Lincoln or Miller 225 amp AC welder and a 50 pound box of 1/8" E6011 welding rod to start with and learn. I am sure you know someone who can help you get started. A secret about an arc welder is you can also CUT iron with it, too! It is not as pretty as with an oxy-acetylene cutting torch, but it makes little ones out of big ones, and beats a hack saw for sure! Then when you get good you can weld it all back together using 1/8" E7018AC rod. Cutting with an Arc WelderFrom an article Richard wrote on 30 Jan 2002 in response to some other comments on the same subject...
>>A secret about an arc welder is you can also CUT iron with it, too!
For metal cutting these rods work best for thin sections of material, about 1/2" thick plate and 1" round bar being the maximum
for efficient operation. Thicker material can be cut, but it becomes difficult because the metal flows around the arc zone and
has a tendency to weld itself back together. By manipulating the rod tip with a longer than normal arc length and allowing
gravity to help, the gas pressure can be used to blow the molten metal away from the arc area leaving a void. As the arc zone
is moved, it leaves a kerf behind. On thicker pieces, the molten metal is not blown clear and drips downward, leaving very rough
edges. For some applications these drips can be re-incorporated into a weld bead, so their existence is not always a problem.
For cutting up metal for scrap, the roughness is of no concern.
Thanks for that explanation, Richard. I'd wondered what it was about 6010 and 6011 that made for such deep penetration and
especially wondered how the vertical and overhead welding worked. I've seen both of these electrodes recommended for beginners
to start with, as well as statements that 6010 is especially difficult to use. Sounds to me like the idea is that if you practice
with 6010 until you can do it well, you're pretty well getting the technique down.
Now, about the 7000 series electrodes: Aren't these low hydrogen electrodes, requiring storage in a hot cabinet at 250 F or so
to keep out moisture and allow the 70,000 PSI range tensile strength to be achieved?
You're welcome, I'm glad to help explain!
The E6010 electrode is a real pain to use on AC because it doesn't have the potassium fluoride arc stabilizer in the coating.
E6011 is about the easiest electrode to use, it strikes an arc very easily, and is difficult to stop the arc. Occasionally a
welder will set the stinger down on a live piece of work, like a ship deck, and later the stinger cable gets kicked or jostled
so the E6011 bare tip will make contact with the deck, and it will weld a bead on its own just laying there! The E7014 and E7024
electrodes will also do that, but they are purposely designed to be worked by dragging.
The codes used for electrode types are that the designation always begins with "E". The first two numbers refer to the strength
of the weld in thousands of pounds per square inch. The third number refers to the welding position the electrode type can be
used successfuly for (but don't you believe it!), 1 refers to all positions, 2 refers to up, down, or horizontal along a wall
plus flat on the floor, and 3 refers to flat on the floor only. In practice, I have never seen a XX3X type electrode, and XX2X
will not work on a wall at all, being usable for flat work only. The fourth number refers to the composition and characteristics
of the electrode coating. Most 70XX electrodes are "low hydrogen", which means there is no hydrogen-containing material in the
electrode coating. Weldment is subject to becoming porous if hydrogen is present during welding. The main sources of hydrogen
contamination is from water, oil, and paint; and many electrode coatings are hygroscopic. As such, low hydrogen electrodes have
to be baked to evaporate the water they absorb during storage. I put the electrodes I will use for a project in my gas barbecue
grill and bake them for about an hour at 350F before using them. The work pieces also have to be free of hydrogen contamination
from rust, water, paint, oil, grease, wood, and all other biologicals. Also, most 70XX electrodes have powdered iron in the
coating, and it rusts if it is left damp. Most electrodes come in a big tin can sealed just like canned food to keep them dry for
indefinate storage. The new E7018AC is not as hygroscopic as the older E7018, but it needs to be dried before use, too. My welding
supplies consist mostly of E6011, E7018AC, and smaller amounts of E6013, E7014, E7024, and various specialty rods, like Ni-Rod
for cast iron and high carbon steel, and Stellite hard facing. Most of my rods are 1/8" size to run at around 80 to 160 amps on
my 225 amp AC welder.
I really like the idea of baking low-hydrogen electrodes for a while in the barbeque grill. I have an electric grill, and my
welder has a 110VDC outlet that'll power it fine!
I've read that E6010, and also E6011 are pretty tolerant of rust, grease and dirt on work. Is that because of the gas-blast
effect from the flux clearing it away?
Also, E6010 is supposed to work only on DC reverse polarity to the extent that one welding equipment maker recommends using it
as a test to see which way the polarity's hooked up. I've been trying to reason this out, also why reverse polarity is supposed
to give extra deep penetration into the work. My thinking is that with reverse polarity the heavy positive gas ions in the arc
will be attracted to the negative workpiece, so the DC arc will create a steady draft of hot plasma against the negative side.
That'd tend to blow the puddle out of the work as you mentioned, and it'd tend to splatter the filler rod material and flux away
from the tip if it were the negative side. Am I even close? If I am, why doesn't this mess up other kinds of rods being used
with straight polarity? Are they just more tolerant of the plasma blast when their flux isn't so gassy to start with?
A very good source of cheap high quality steel is from scrap and recycling yards. It is almost always painted or extremely dirty
with rust and grease, which make it unweldable without first cleaning the areas to be welded. Here is a cleaning trick used by
welders when they have greasy, dirty, rusty, damp steel to weld. Before making the first actual weld pass, take a rod of E6010 or
E6011 on reverse polarity (the normal polarity for these rods, anyway) and make an initial pass over the weld zone with a very
long arc length. Watch where the hot spot on the work piece is, and move it just fast enough so as to not quite melt the steel
surface. It may be necessary to run the arc over the weld zone a few times before all the grease, dirt, paint and/or rust is
burned and blown off by the arc gases. The metal from the rod will cover the area with thick spatter, but it will pretty much
brush off with a wire brush, along with all the other stuff you don't want in your weld. Lead is a source of weakened welds, and
paint is a big source of lead. Lead was banned in house paint only, it is still used for industrial coatings. By the way, after
heating or welding something and you have a sickeningly sweet taste in your mouth, nose, and throat, there is lead present, so
take precautions not to breath the fumes.
Both DC and AC have their own extremely useful characteristics, the ideal welding machine should have both.
Richard : being a retired welder with thirty years experience of Field
welding I find your post interesting to say the least I like it . you know
your stuff . But I used to leave my 7018 out in the open (real world) when
I wanted to use the rod I would dry it out by just sticking on plate until
it dryed it out in the field you just do what works
Ah, and I thought it was my bad welding - getting the rod stuck to the job
and having to prise it loose, before it melted completely.
Now I can say I was just drying out the rod!
Colin
If you are a beginning welder, practice striking an arc on a scrap block of graphite or aluminum. Graphite is the much preferred
of the two, but aluminum is easier to find. Starting with those can be a good confidence builder because there is instant success.
After practicing with those materials, the next step is to a real work piece, and is usually very easy.
The easiest welding electrodes to start an arc with are E7024, E7014, E6011, E7018AC, and E6013. Like I mentioned before,
sometimes one of the above rods in a stinger clamp gets accidentally laid down on a "live" surface like a ship deck, and it will
strike its own arc and weld a bead without human intervention! On the other end of the spectrum, the absolute hardest electrode
type to get "lit" is the old E7018. It mostly just sticks, and like Colin said, you have to prise the miserable thing off and then
try again, and again, and again - - -. Sometimes it takes a hammer and chisel to get the electrode unstuck from the work piece. I
destroyed my electrode holder stinger clamp in one day because in trying to get the electrodes unstuck it would often pull out of
the clamp, drawing the arc in the clamp and quickly burning it out. After spending $25 I didn't have for a new stinger clamp, I
wizened up and got a scrap block of graphite, which I put in electrical contact next to where my weld bead was going to start from.
I struck the arc on the block of graphite, which NOTHING will stick to, and then once the arc got going good and strong,
transferred it over to the work piece. An aluminum block will also work, it also has fair non-stick properties. Of course the way
out of this is not to use E7018. It is miserable stuff that requires an air hammer to clean up after and it is just too hard to
start. The E7018AC that has replaced it is a dream to work with! It usually makes self-cleaning welds, strikes an arc without any
hassle, restarts VERY easily, is stronger than the original it has replaced, and is easier to use in difficult positions (like
overhead). But, if you have a bunch of old rod to use up that is difficult to strike an arc with, start the stuff on a graphite
or aluminum block first.
Work and play safely,-------Richard Allen
Please note that the words on this page are © Copyright 2002 to their respective authors. Please do not reuse their words
without their express permission.
|
|
Last modified Sunday, 20-Jul-2003 15:28:00 BST |
|
|
|
All documents and images on this site are
© Copyright 1995-2008 Paul Pavlinovich unless otherwise stated. You may not copy any documents or images from this site without explicit written permission except as allowed by Statutory License under The Copyright Act. More Information.
e-mail This site is best viewed with the free open source browser Firefox.
|